Thursday, August 26, 2004

Under fire

Here is a commentary by a marine who looked into all the documents of the March 13 incident and straighforwardly lists his findings and makes the conclusion that Rassman is honestly mistaken about the incident.
25.) The "Battle Damage" report of March 13, 1969 does not reflect any bullet damage to any of the 5 Swift boats. The lack of any bullet holes in any of the five Swift boats following the incident presents reliable forensic evidence that there was no enemy weapons fire. Also, none of the personnel involved in the incident received any bullet wounds during the incident. In a waterway less than 75 yards wide, if the enemy on both sides of the river were in covered positions with clear fields of fire, the enemy could not possibly miss the 50 foot long aluminum boats. Rassmann and many others would be dead considering the length of time the boats were present supporting Swift boat PCF-3.
This is the most convincing evidence to me that there was no enemy fire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home